Education
Budtenders Guide

Systems: Traceability and Point-of-Sale Systems

Complete & Continue Next Lesson Learn More

No matter if your working in Cultivation, Manufacturing, or Retail, its important to know about some of the systems you will be working with. BioTrack and METRC—two names that loom large in the world of cannabis compliance, tracing every bud from seed to sale with all the regulation that only a tightly controlled market can muster. These systems are the silent giants, keeping states informed and businesses accountable. They're also the only two major players in this space. Why? Because each system has carved out its own niche, aligning with specific state needs, and the high stakes in compliance leave little room for upstarts.

Why Only Two?

There’s a good reason why these two are the big kids on the block: complexity, cost, and infrastructure. States want a traceability system that’s tough as nails, and with METRC and BioTrack's years of battle-tested functionality, states know they’re getting tools that keep the black market out and keep tax dollars where they belong. These systems come with years of regulatory partnership, data reliability, and high-security standards that newer systems struggle to match. Plus, for states looking to implement a system on their own, the high upfront investment and complexity create a barrier that limits competition.

BioTrack Overview

BioTrack serves two primary roles: helping businesses track every gram of product and letting states monitor every move from growth to consumer sale. It operates in states like New Mexico, New York, Hawaii, Maryland, and Illinois, each using either BioTrack Core for business tracking or BioTrack Trace for regulatory monitoring.

  1. BioTrack Core (Paid): This version is tailored for cannabis operators—cultivators, processors, dispensaries—tracking product through its lifecycle to keep inventory in line, ensure compliance, and provide seamless operational tracking.

  2. BioTrack Trace (Free): This free version monitors every licensed business in the state, but with less functionality them its Core counterpart.

Cost Structure:

  • Upfront Fees: BioTrack hits license holders with a one-time licensing fee ranging from $500 to $2,000—a baseline that covers system setup depending on business size and state needs.

  • Monthly Fees: For those in the game, recurring monthly charges sit between $400 and $1,000. Complexity and scale play a big role in what you’ll pay.

  • User Fees: Some businesses will see per-user fees for additional access, making the total cost a customizable experience.

Who Pays?

  • License holders generally shoulder the burden, paying subscription fees and any per-user charges, though certain states may step in with subsidies funded by tax dollars or licensing fees.

METRC Overview

Then there’s METRC—the RFID-powered compliance machine in states like California, Colorado, Michigan, Oregon, and Massachusetts. METRC’s RFID tagging system offers a different approach, attaching a unique RFID tag to every plant and product package, enabling precision tracking at scale and providing regulators with unparalleled control over the cannabis ecosystem.

Key Differences from BioTrack:

  • Tagging System: Unlike BioTrack’s subscription-heavy model, METRC uses RFID tags to track every plant and package, with costs averaging $0.25 to $0.45 per tag. This approach makes compliance highly granular, but every tag adds up in cost.

  • Monthly Fees: Licensees pay METRC a monthly fee between $40 and $100—a lower monthly rate, but the tagging expenses add up.

  • Training Costs: New users are required to go through METRC’s training, costing $250 to $300 per user—a necessary step in states that demand real-time data accuracy.

Who Pays?

  • Licensees cover the majority of costs, from RFID tags to training and monthly fees. Occasionally, states absorb a portion, but this is rare.

Cost Summary

  • METRC: Businesses pay for tags, training, and a monthly fee in an incremental cost model that can add up over time.

  • BioTrack: Primarily a subscription-based model, BioTrack charges upfront licensing fees and recurring costs, making it pricier initially but predictable on a month-to-month basis.

Key Terms in BioTrack:

  • UBI (Universal Business Identifier): The UBI is a unique identifier assigned to each licensed business, making it easy for regulators and businesses to trace specific transactions back to their origin.

  • Manifest: A manifest is a detailed document used during cannabis transportation. It includes information about the products being transported, their origin, destination, and transport conditions, ensuring the legal and secure transfer of cannabis between facilities.

  • Transfer: A transfer in BioTrack refers to moving cannabis or cannabis-derived products from one licensed location to another. This movement could involve wholesale transactions, inventory relocations, or transportation between production and retail facilities.

  • Sync: In the context of BioTrack and state monitoring, a sync involves updating the state’s central traceability system with the latest information from each licensed business. This includes inventory changes, sales, transfers, and production data.

    • Importance of Regular Syncs:

      • Regular syncs are crucial for maintaining real-time compliance with state regulations. Syncs ensure that all data in the state's monitoring system is current, which is essential for tracking inventory, preventing diversion, and spotting inconsistencies or potential compliance violations. If businesses fail to conduct syncs, discrepancies may arise, leading to fines, penalties, or even license suspension. By syncing regularly, businesses ensure they remain compliant and transparent, reducing risk and fostering a safer, more regulated market.

      • Conducting consistent syncs also ensures that regulators have an accurate picture of market supply and can help businesses track any missing or misreported inventory.

  • Tagging: Tagging refers to the process of assigning unique identifiers to individual plants, batches, or products. These tags, sometimes QR or RFID-enabled, are essential for tracking cannabis throughout its lifecycle and are mandatory for state compliance.

  • Batch/Lot Tracking: This feature tracks cannabis products in batches or lots, allowing businesses to identify and isolate products from specific growth cycles or processing batches. Batch tracking is crucial for quality control, testing, and recall management.

  • Package Tracking: Package tracking helps monitor product movement between different stages, such as from cultivation to processing or from processing to retail. Each package has a unique identifier, helping maintain chain-of-custody data for compliance.

  • Waste Management: BioTrack includes a waste-tracking function, essential for documenting and disposing of unusable or excess cannabis material. This data ensures that waste is handled according to state regulations, preventing diversion or unregulated disposal.

  • User Permissions and Roles: BioTrack allows businesses to set specific roles and permissions for employees based on their duties. This feature limits data access and activity within the system, enhancing security and ensuring employees only access what they need for their responsibilities.

Key Functions:

  • Compliance Reporting: BioTrack automates compliance reporting by generating and submitting reports to state authorities based on collected data. This function simplifies meeting regulatory requirements and minimizes the chance of human error in compliance tasks.

  • Inventory Reconciliation: This feature matches physical inventory counts with records in BioTrack to ensure data accuracy. Regular reconciliation is critical to identify discrepancies and confirm inventory integrity.

  • Adjustments: Adjustments allow businesses to document changes in inventory outside normal operations, such as correcting errors or accounting for spoilage. Proper documentation is essential for compliance audits and inventory accuracy.

  • Point-of-Sale (POS) Integration: For retail operations, BioTrack’s POS integration records sales transactions in real time. This function ensures accurate inventory levels, immediate compliance data logging, and financial tracking.

  • Audit Logs: Audit logs keep a complete history of every action taken within the system, including changes to data and user actions. These logs provide a transparent record for internal reviews and regulatory audits.

Why Knowing These Functions Matters:

Understanding these terms and functions is essential for businesses using BioTrack because they support not only compliance but also operational efficiency. Functions like inventory reconciliation and batch tracking are key for maintaining quality control and tracking product lineage, which is essential for recalls or quality issues. Audit logs and compliance reporting streamline regulatory inspections and ensure that businesses can demonstrate transparency, a vital part of operating in the highly regulated cannabis industry.

Third-Party POS Systems: Filling the Gaps

While BioTrack and METRC deliver the necessary tracking for compliance, they leave gaps in sales and customer experience. Enter third-party Point-of-Sale (POS) systems—software like Cova and Dutchie that do more than just track compliance. These POS systems bring real-time sales data, inventory management, and customer relationship management to cannabis businesses, integrating with BioTrack or METRC to streamline day-to-day operations.

Why They Are Used: POS systems like Cova and Dutchie provide critical features such as customer relationship management, product recommendations, loyalty programs, and advanced analytics that traceability systems lack. They focus on sales optimization, user experience, and operational insights that are crucial for the business side but aren’t part of regulatory systems.

Examples of POS Providers:

  • Cova offers a compliance-integrated POS system widely used in the U.S. and Canada, known for its user-friendly interface and robust reporting.

  • Dutchie provides POS and e-commerce solutions that prioritize seamless online and in-store integration, allowing dispensaries to manage customer orders and sales effectively.

Operating Over Traceability Systems: While METRC and BioTrack focus on regulatory compliance, third-party POS systems enable businesses to operate more efficiently and improve customer satisfaction. These systems automatically sync with traceability data to ensure compliance while freeing businesses to focus on enhancing retail experience and customer service.

By blending regulatory compliance through METRC or BioTrack with customer-centric features from POS providers like Cova and Dutchie, cannabis businesses can meet state requirements while optimizing retail performance and customer engagement.

When using third-party POS systems integrated with BioTrack or METRC, cannabis businesses may encounter several challenges that affect data accuracy, compliance, and operational efficiency. Here’s an overview of potential issues and their impact on cannabis businesses:

Common Challenges with Third-Party Systems:

  1. Data Sync Failures:

    • Issue: Sync failures can occur when a transaction or inventory update in the POS doesn’t properly transfer to BioTrack or METRC. This can happen due to network disruptions, software glitches, or incompatibility between systems.

    • Impact: If transactions fail to sync, compliance data may be incomplete, leading to discrepancies in inventory records that could trigger audits or compliance violations. This can expose businesses to penalties if regulators believe inventory is unaccounted for.

  2. Partial Integration:

    • Issue: In some cases, the integration between third-party POS systems and traceability platforms may not cover all data fields or functions, resulting in gaps in reporting.

    • Impact: Businesses may need to manually re-enter data into BioTrack or METRC, increasing the risk of human error and consuming valuable time. Partial integration can also complicate the tracking of certain data points, like batch numbers or lab test results, critical for compliance.

  3. Rehandling of Data:

    • Issue: When sync issues or partial integrations occur, businesses often need to rehandle or manually correct data, a process that increases the workload and introduces the potential for errors.

    • Impact: Manual rehandling can lead to mismatches between actual inventory and reported figures. These mismatches complicate inventory reconciliation and can create compliance risks if not addressed swiftly and accurately.

  4. Latency and Real-Time Compliance:

    • Issue: Many compliance systems require real-time updates for inventory and sales data. Delays or latency in syncs between POS and traceability systems can result in discrepancies.

    • Impact: Latency can disrupt accurate reporting, especially in high-transaction environments where inventory levels fluctuate quickly. This can be particularly problematic for businesses in states that mandate immediate data reporting.

  5. Duplicate or Incomplete Records:

    • Issue: Duplicate records can arise if a transaction syncs incorrectly, while incomplete records might appear if certain data fields aren’t captured during syncs.

    • Impact: Duplicate or incomplete records create inconsistencies in inventory counts, which are challenging to trace and correct, potentially leading to compliance issues during an audit.

What Happens When a Transaction Fails to Sync with BioTrack:

When a transaction fails to sync with BioTrack:

  • Compliance Risks: Inventory data in BioTrack will not reflect the actual inventory levels at the business, potentially creating non-compliance risks.

  • Manual Corrections Required: Businesses must review logs to identify and re-enter the transaction data manually, adding to operational overhead.

  • Audit Discrepancies: If uncorrected, these issues can create discrepancies that may become apparent during an audit, triggering further investigation or penalties.

Why 100% Integration Matters:

Complete integration is essential to ensure data flows accurately and continuously from POS systems to compliance platforms like BioTrack and METRC. When integration is partial or incomplete:

  • Compliance Gaps: Data points may be missing, which can result in non-compliance with state-mandated reporting.

  • Operational Inefficiencies: Staff may spend significant time on redundant data entry or error corrections, diverting attention from customer service or other critical tasks.

  • Increased Error Potential: Manual workarounds introduce a higher likelihood of error, which affects data integrity and could lead to costly compliance issues.

Mitigating Challenges with POS Systems:

Businesses can minimize these issues by:

  • Choosing Reliable POS Providers: Systems like Cova and Dutchie are known for their robust integration capabilities with BioTrack and METRC.

  • Frequent Data Reconciliation: Regularly comparing POS data with BioTrack or METRC records can help detect and resolve discrepancies before they escalate.

  • Training and Documentation: Ensuring employees are well-trained on both the POS system and the traceability software helps reduce errors and improves handling of integration issues.

In summary, integrating third-party POS systems with BioTrack or METRC can enhance efficiency but requires careful management to avoid data inconsistencies and compliance risks. Frequent syncing, comprehensive training, and regular reconciliations are essential to maintaining a compliant and streamlined cannabis operation.